<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MUSCLE MEMORY &#8211; 6 FCP TIPS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lfhd.net/2010/01/23/muscle-memory-6-fcp-tips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lfhd.net/2010/01/23/muscle-memory-6-fcp-tips/</link>
	<description>High definition editing from the trenches...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:26:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shaneross</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2010/01/23/muscle-memory-6-fcp-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-2002</link>
		<dc:creator>shaneross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lfhd.net/?p=714#comment-2002</guid>
		<description>I tend to do both.  I duplicate my sequences when I work on the rough cut.  Then when I move to the FINE cut, I duplicate the project...delete the old duplicated sequences...and then work from there...duplicating the FINE cut versions.  QUicker than opening older projects.

Still, for smaller projects, duplicating the sequence is still a really good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to do both.  I duplicate my sequences when I work on the rough cut.  Then when I move to the FINE cut, I duplicate the project&#8230;delete the old duplicated sequences&#8230;and then work from there&#8230;duplicating the FINE cut versions.  QUicker than opening older projects.</p>
<p>Still, for smaller projects, duplicating the sequence is still a really good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2010/01/23/muscle-memory-6-fcp-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-2001</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lfhd.net/?p=714#comment-2001</guid>
		<description>Duplicating your sequence ad-naseum in FCP is a bad idea. It&#039;s not a big deal for around 10 versions of your sequence, but if you&#039;re working on a feature duplicating can cause completely unmanageable and problematic project files.

I tell editors to duplicate the PROJECT file every day, so that they can delete sequences and keep their main fcp project under 150mb. Also, I get them to have a separate project file for the bins. This really helps for projects larger than a pilot/one-off show, and organizing a workflow with assistant editors.

Frankly that&#039;s the one thing that Avid still does much better than FCP. The bin/project structure into actual separate files is really smart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duplicating your sequence ad-naseum in FCP is a bad idea. It&#8217;s not a big deal for around 10 versions of your sequence, but if you&#8217;re working on a feature duplicating can cause completely unmanageable and problematic project files.</p>
<p>I tell editors to duplicate the PROJECT file every day, so that they can delete sequences and keep their main fcp project under 150mb. Also, I get them to have a separate project file for the bins. This really helps for projects larger than a pilot/one-off show, and organizing a workflow with assistant editors.</p>
<p>Frankly that&#8217;s the one thing that Avid still does much better than FCP. The bin/project structure into actual separate files is really smart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

