<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AVID VS FCP AGAIN&#8230; NICE LEVEL HEADED DISCUSSION</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lfhd.net/2009/12/10/avid-vs-fcp-again-nice-level-headed-discussion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lfhd.net/2009/12/10/avid-vs-fcp-again-nice-level-headed-discussion/</link>
	<description>High definition editing from the trenches...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:26:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: suresh nair</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2009/12/10/avid-vs-fcp-again-nice-level-headed-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-2411</link>
		<dc:creator>suresh nair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 10:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lfhd.net/?p=685#comment-2411</guid>
		<description>for the last 15 years i have been using AVID .....fcp is nothing infront of AVID...Coz AVID MEANS EDITOR... WHERE FCP=ADOBE PREMIERE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for the last 15 years i have been using AVID &#8230;..fcp is nothing infront of AVID&#8230;Coz AVID MEANS EDITOR&#8230; WHERE FCP=ADOBE PREMIERE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaneross</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2009/12/10/avid-vs-fcp-again-nice-level-headed-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-1973</link>
		<dc:creator>shaneross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lfhd.net/?p=685#comment-1973</guid>
		<description>Sorry to disagree with your last comment, but I do.  I am a professional, and FCP is THE choice for me at this time.  I will work on an Avid when I am seated in front of one, or if an Avid will do something that FCP cannot and I need that something for the job.  But thus far my first choice is FCP.  And I know many MANY other PROFESSIONALS that feel the same way.

That was a poor blanket statement to make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to disagree with your last comment, but I do.  I am a professional, and FCP is THE choice for me at this time.  I will work on an Avid when I am seated in front of one, or if an Avid will do something that FCP cannot and I need that something for the job.  But thus far my first choice is FCP.  And I know many MANY other PROFESSIONALS that feel the same way.</p>
<p>That was a poor blanket statement to make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Galllagher</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2009/12/10/avid-vs-fcp-again-nice-level-headed-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-1972</link>
		<dc:creator>David Galllagher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lfhd.net/?p=685#comment-1972</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never understood the big argument between the two sides.  For me, I&#039;ve been editing for over 7 years, and use both FCP and AMC.  I find certain plus&#039; and minus of both.  In the end the client doesn&#039;t care about what system you edit on, they just want to see the final product well done.  I&#039;ve been preaching for the longest time that really no matter your preference of system as long as you are able to utilize the tool to reach a professional broadcast quality finish, WHO CARES?  The finish line doesn&#039;t account for &#039;what kind of car crossed&#039; just that one did.  If the argument is strickly technical, then the discussion should be based on simple reality of hardware / software.  Without going into detail, Avid has long been the preferred system by worldwide professional editors and studios due to it&#039;s ability to streamline heavy workflow in a reliable, efficient manner.  The big strides FCP has made over the years should certainly be recognized as a serious threat to those stuck in AMC but Apple is still has a little ways to go before unseating Avid as THE choice amongst professionals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never understood the big argument between the two sides.  For me, I&#8217;ve been editing for over 7 years, and use both FCP and AMC.  I find certain plus&#8217; and minus of both.  In the end the client doesn&#8217;t care about what system you edit on, they just want to see the final product well done.  I&#8217;ve been preaching for the longest time that really no matter your preference of system as long as you are able to utilize the tool to reach a professional broadcast quality finish, WHO CARES?  The finish line doesn&#8217;t account for &#8216;what kind of car crossed&#8217; just that one did.  If the argument is strickly technical, then the discussion should be based on simple reality of hardware / software.  Without going into detail, Avid has long been the preferred system by worldwide professional editors and studios due to it&#8217;s ability to streamline heavy workflow in a reliable, efficient manner.  The big strides FCP has made over the years should certainly be recognized as a serious threat to those stuck in AMC but Apple is still has a little ways to go before unseating Avid as THE choice amongst professionals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maqhead</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2009/12/10/avid-vs-fcp-again-nice-level-headed-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-1917</link>
		<dc:creator>maqhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 09:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lfhd.net/?p=685#comment-1917</guid>
		<description>Thanks dude...  That&#039;s actually a great tip.  I&#039;ll put it to use for sure.  Happy holidays!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks dude&#8230;  That&#8217;s actually a great tip.  I&#8217;ll put it to use for sure.  Happy holidays!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan Reeve</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2009/12/10/avid-vs-fcp-again-nice-level-headed-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-1910</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan Reeve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lfhd.net/?p=685#comment-1910</guid>
		<description>The thing for me with FCP/Avid has always been trying to defines terms of reference and getting the most realistic and objective overviews of what each does best and worst - where the strengths really lie.

While I know it&#039;s possible, for example, I would stay well clear of muti-suite shared edits in FCP.

I use Avid 97% of the times so I&#039;ve be fishing for insight from those who switch back and forth a bit more often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing for me with FCP/Avid has always been trying to defines terms of reference and getting the most realistic and objective overviews of what each does best and worst &#8211; where the strengths really lie.</p>
<p>While I know it&#8217;s possible, for example, I would stay well clear of muti-suite shared edits in FCP.</p>
<p>I use Avid 97% of the times so I&#8217;ve be fishing for insight from those who switch back and forth a bit more often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

