<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE AVID/FCP 2-STEP &#8211; @ LAFCPUG</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lfhd.net/2009/11/02/the-avidfcp-2-step-lafcpug/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lfhd.net/2009/11/02/the-avidfcp-2-step-lafcpug/</link>
	<description>High definition editing from the trenches...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:26:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shaneross</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2009/11/02/the-avidfcp-2-step-lafcpug/comment-page-1/#comment-1837</link>
		<dc:creator>shaneross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lfhd.net/?p=622#comment-1837</guid>
		<description>Well, not having used FILM SCRIBE I can only assume it is something for FILM.  I don&#039;t think you&#039;d mix and match FILM like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, not having used FILM SCRIBE I can only assume it is something for FILM.  I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;d mix and match FILM like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Fuller</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2009/11/02/the-avidfcp-2-step-lafcpug/comment-page-1/#comment-1836</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Fuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lfhd.net/?p=622#comment-1836</guid>
		<description>I wonder what FilmScribe lists of sequences with mixed and matched frame rate footage will look like?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what FilmScribe lists of sequences with mixed and matched frame rate footage will look like?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chomper129</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2009/11/02/the-avidfcp-2-step-lafcpug/comment-page-1/#comment-1822</link>
		<dc:creator>Chomper129</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lfhd.net/?p=622#comment-1822</guid>
		<description>Oh and BTW, just for fun, I threw in some PAL footage like Dylan suggested.  It&#039;s a tad bit soft, but overall, pretty amazing considering its doing it on the fly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and BTW, just for fun, I threw in some PAL footage like Dylan suggested.  It&#8217;s a tad bit soft, but overall, pretty amazing considering its doing it on the fly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chomper129</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2009/11/02/the-avidfcp-2-step-lafcpug/comment-page-1/#comment-1821</link>
		<dc:creator>Chomper129</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lfhd.net/?p=622#comment-1821</guid>
		<description>I have been using this quite a bit, and it has been flawless.  most of the work is done on an 8 core mac pro with fibre drives, but when I take it home on my 2.53 MBP with esata, I dont have any issues.  I am floored at the quality and the speed.  Avid definitely got this one right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using this quite a bit, and it has been flawless.  most of the work is done on an 8 core mac pro with fibre drives, but when I take it home on my 2.53 MBP with esata, I dont have any issues.  I am floored at the quality and the speed.  Avid definitely got this one right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaneross</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2009/11/02/the-avidfcp-2-step-lafcpug/comment-page-1/#comment-1819</link>
		<dc:creator>shaneross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lfhd.net/?p=622#comment-1819</guid>
		<description>Nov. 18.  But I and the others will be on laptops...only the MOJO would work.  But from my conversations with Avid, those boxes don&#039;t come into play with this option, only the speed of the drives and the processors of the machine...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nov. 18.  But I and the others will be on laptops&#8230;only the MOJO would work.  But from my conversations with Avid, those boxes don&#8217;t come into play with this option, only the speed of the drives and the processors of the machine&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam S.</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2009/11/02/the-avidfcp-2-step-lafcpug/comment-page-1/#comment-1818</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lfhd.net/?p=622#comment-1818</guid>
		<description>I have done a few tests with this as well.  What date is your presentation for LAFCPUG?  I might have a nitris DX or mojo DX available if hardware would be helpful.

Adam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have done a few tests with this as well.  What date is your presentation for LAFCPUG?  I might have a nitris DX or mojo DX available if hardware would be helpful.</p>
<p>Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan Reeve</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2009/11/02/the-avidfcp-2-step-lafcpug/comment-page-1/#comment-1812</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan Reeve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lfhd.net/?p=622#comment-1812</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve only played with Mix and Match a bit, but I&#039;ve been pretty impressed - the visual quality of Avid&#039;s Blended Interpolation seems very good.

You should make the test a big hard too - put some 25 or 50fps footage in there... As it is all your framerates are 59.94Hz timebase - the conversion there is a lot easier than mixing 50Hz and 59.94Hz...

I can send you some PAL Avid media if you need it - just tweet me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve only played with Mix and Match a bit, but I&#8217;ve been pretty impressed &#8211; the visual quality of Avid&#8217;s Blended Interpolation seems very good.</p>
<p>You should make the test a big hard too &#8211; put some 25 or 50fps footage in there&#8230; As it is all your framerates are 59.94Hz timebase &#8211; the conversion there is a lot easier than mixing 50Hz and 59.94Hz&#8230;</p>
<p>I can send you some PAL Avid media if you need it &#8211; just tweet me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

