<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AVID MC 4.0 &#8211; INSIDE LOOK AT MIX &amp; MATCH</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lfhd.net/2009/10/01/avid-mc-4-0-inside-look-at-mix-match/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lfhd.net/2009/10/01/avid-mc-4-0-inside-look-at-mix-match/</link>
	<description>High definition editing from the trenches...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:52:32 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Avid (MC4) Mix &#38; Match (of formats on timeline, no need to render)</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2009/10/01/avid-mc-4-0-inside-look-at-mix-match/comment-page-1/#comment-1962</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Avid (MC4) Mix &#38; Match (of formats on timeline, no need to render)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 02:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lfhd.net/?p=590#comment-1962</guid>
		<description>[...] http://lfhd.net/2009/10/01/avid-mc-4-0-inside-look-at-mix-match [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://lfhd.net/2009/10/01/avid-mc-4-0-inside-look-at-mix-match" rel="nofollow">http://lfhd.net/2009/10/01/avid-mc-4-0-inside-look-at-mix-match</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ebonyMovie</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2009/10/01/avid-mc-4-0-inside-look-at-mix-match/comment-page-1/#comment-1941</link>
		<dc:creator>ebonyMovie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lfhd.net/?p=590#comment-1941</guid>
		<description>This blog looks nice. do you use ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog looks nice. do you use ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AVID MC 4.0 – INSIDE LOOK AT MIX &#38; MATCH</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2009/10/01/avid-mc-4-0-inside-look-at-mix-match/comment-page-1/#comment-1826</link>
		<dc:creator>AVID MC 4.0 – INSIDE LOOK AT MIX &#38; MATCH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lfhd.net/?p=590#comment-1826</guid>
		<description>[...] Your sequence setting is what you tell it.  1080i, 720p, 525i…whathaveyou.  And whatever clip you add to that that ISN’T that format, gets scaled to that format…using a filter called a MOTION ADAPTER.  This add interpolation to match the sequence settings, and this is added automatically when you add new footage that doesn’t match.  And there are all sorts of interpolation modes…these are all user selectable. read more&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Your sequence setting is what you tell it.  1080i, 720p, 525i…whathaveyou.  And whatever clip you add to that that ISN’T that format, gets scaled to that format…using a filter called a MOTION ADAPTER.  This add interpolation to match the sequence settings, and this is added automatically when you add new footage that doesn’t match.  And there are all sorts of interpolation modes…these are all user selectable. read more&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Editblog &#187; Next LAFCPUG Meeting is the Avid/FCP 2-Step</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2009/10/01/avid-mc-4-0-inside-look-at-mix-match/comment-page-1/#comment-1808</link>
		<dc:creator>The Editblog &#187; Next LAFCPUG Meeting is the Avid/FCP 2-Step</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lfhd.net/?p=590#comment-1808</guid>
		<description>[...] Cohen will show us what is new in the Avid Media Composer 4.0. Shane Ross will show off the new Mix &amp; Match capability in MC4.0 which allows you to combine different formats, frame rates, and resolutions all [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cohen will show us what is new in the Avid Media Composer 4.0. Shane Ross will show off the new Mix &amp; Match capability in MC4.0 which allows you to combine different formats, frame rates, and resolutions all [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaneross</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2009/10/01/avid-mc-4-0-inside-look-at-mix-match/comment-page-1/#comment-1773</link>
		<dc:creator>shaneross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 01:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lfhd.net/?p=590#comment-1773</guid>
		<description>True...to be on the SAFE side, always make sure you transcode to a common format.  This is for all those people who get stuff thrown at them, from all sorts of cameras.  Which, unfortunately, is all to common.  Or what happens in inexperienced people get all sorts of formats and don&#039;t know what to do with them.  

I am in favor of erring on the safe side too.  But I am awfully tempted to download the demo and throw all I have at it to test.  But for output all I have is an SD Mojo...so I am hampered there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True&#8230;to be on the SAFE side, always make sure you transcode to a common format.  This is for all those people who get stuff thrown at them, from all sorts of cameras.  Which, unfortunately, is all to common.  Or what happens in inexperienced people get all sorts of formats and don&#8217;t know what to do with them.  </p>
<p>I am in favor of erring on the safe side too.  But I am awfully tempted to download the demo and throw all I have at it to test.  But for output all I have is an SD Mojo&#8230;so I am hampered there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Wright</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2009/10/01/avid-mc-4-0-inside-look-at-mix-match/comment-page-1/#comment-1772</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 23:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lfhd.net/?p=590#comment-1772</guid>
		<description>I hate be skeptical, but I don&#039;t this is something that you can say is fool proof.  At some point, under some strange combination of events this will fail.  What Avid is doing is so complicated that it is bound to break down at some point.  Pixel just don&#039;t like being scaled and mixing and matching field orders and frame rates will at some point yield an unpredictable result.  IMO, if you want to play it safe, conform everything to match the timeline in advance of editing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate be skeptical, but I don&#8217;t this is something that you can say is fool proof.  At some point, under some strange combination of events this will fail.  What Avid is doing is so complicated that it is bound to break down at some point.  Pixel just don&#8217;t like being scaled and mixing and matching field orders and frame rates will at some point yield an unpredictable result.  IMO, if you want to play it safe, conform everything to match the timeline in advance of editing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaneross</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2009/10/01/avid-mc-4-0-inside-look-at-mix-match/comment-page-1/#comment-1765</link>
		<dc:creator>shaneross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lfhd.net/?p=590#comment-1765</guid>
		<description>MUCH better.  Avid MC automatically adds a plugin that is designed to do this upscale in very smart ways.  It isn&#039;t just scaling it and then repeating a frame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MUCH better.  Avid MC automatically adds a plugin that is designed to do this upscale in very smart ways.  It isn&#8217;t just scaling it and then repeating a frame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewK</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2009/10/01/avid-mc-4-0-inside-look-at-mix-match/comment-page-1/#comment-1764</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lfhd.net/?p=590#comment-1764</guid>
		<description>So I assume Avid&#039;s &#039;open timeline&#039; implementation is much better than FCP&#039;s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I assume Avid&#8217;s &#8216;open timeline&#8217; implementation is much better than FCP&#8217;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Simmons</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2009/10/01/avid-mc-4-0-inside-look-at-mix-match/comment-page-1/#comment-1763</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 04:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lfhd.net/?p=590#comment-1763</guid>
		<description>Great look at Avid 4.0!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great look at Avid 4.0!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
