<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AJA I/O HD Premliminary Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lfhd.net/2007/10/02/aja-io-hd-premliminary-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lfhd.net/2007/10/02/aja-io-hd-premliminary-report/</link>
	<description>Musings of an NLE ronin...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 16:07:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Gottshalk</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2007/10/02/aja-io-hd-premliminary-report/comment-page-1/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Gottshalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postfifthpictures.com/lfhd/2007/10/02/aja-io-hd-premliminary-report/#comment-449</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been waiting for this for my octocore macs as well. Being able to move it from edit station to station with out cracking a case is a win-win situation. I hate the idea of an internal card that becomes obsolete when the new systems decide to use a new bus structure.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Like you Shane, I&#039;m waiting on replacing my PB G4 with a new Macbook Pro until the new ones come out. Of course, I&#039;ll still probably hang on to th e old beast as it is the best way right now for me to offload the P2 cards in the field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been waiting for this for my octocore macs as well. Being able to move it from edit station to station with out cracking a case is a win-win situation. I hate the idea of an internal card that becomes obsolete when the new systems decide to use a new bus structure.</p>
<p>Like you Shane, I&#8217;m waiting on replacing my PB G4 with a new Macbook Pro until the new ones come out. Of course, I&#8217;ll still probably hang on to th e old beast as it is the best way right now for me to offload the P2 cards in the field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Ross</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2007/10/02/aja-io-hd-premliminary-report/comment-page-1/#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postfifthpictures.com/lfhd/2007/10/02/aja-io-hd-premliminary-report/#comment-446</guid>
		<description>Yup...only captures at ProRes...or DVCPRO HD...and any of the SD formats, like DVCPRO 50 or uncompress 8-bit or 10-bit SD.  Uncompressed HD it doesn&#039;t do...and never claimed that it would ever do.  If you need uncompressed HD, then the Kona LH or Kona 3 are your options.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But you do know that ProRes 422 has uncompressed HD quality at uncompressed SD file sizes, right?  It is a direct competitor to the Avid DNxHD codec, that many many Avid editors use as a finishing codec.  ProRes is a codec that really should be looked at and tested.  The drive and space requirements are very low, and quality still high (I have seen examples and they are good)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup&#8230;only captures at ProRes&#8230;or DVCPRO HD&#8230;and any of the SD formats, like DVCPRO 50 or uncompress 8-bit or 10-bit SD.  Uncompressed HD it doesn&#8217;t do&#8230;and never claimed that it would ever do.  If you need uncompressed HD, then the Kona LH or Kona 3 are your options.</p>
<p>But you do know that ProRes 422 has uncompressed HD quality at uncompressed SD file sizes, right?  It is a direct competitor to the Avid DNxHD codec, that many many Avid editors use as a finishing codec.  ProRes is a codec that really should be looked at and tested.  The drive and space requirements are very low, and quality still high (I have seen examples and they are good)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://lfhd.net/2007/10/02/aja-io-hd-premliminary-report/comment-page-1/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postfifthpictures.com/lfhd/2007/10/02/aja-io-hd-premliminary-report/#comment-445</guid>
		<description>So that review makes it sound like the IO HD only does ProRes. Is that the case? If so, Kona 3 makes a whole lot more sense for most systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So that review makes it sound like the IO HD only does ProRes. Is that the case? If so, Kona 3 makes a whole lot more sense for most systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

